A Brief History of Lean Manufacturing

The history of lean manufacturing can be traced back almost 100 years in some guises. Here is an overview.

Taiichi Ohno is regarded as the founder of the Toyota Production System (TPS) which was developed from 1950 following an excursion to the Rouge Ford plant in the US by Eiji Toyoda, a young engineer who reported his findings on the Ford system back to Ohno.

In the English translation of his book ‘TPS – beyond large scale production’ Ohno (1988) describes how TPS evolved out of need, as the market place in post war Japan required small quantities of cars to be produced in many varieties. This was very different to the Ford principle of mass-producing the same Automobiles in large production runs.

Although TPS began in 1950, it was not until the 1973 oil crisis that other Japanese firms began to take notice, and since this time the system has been studied, copied and implemented across many industries.

Womack, Jones and Roos (1990) coined the phrase ‘Lean Manufacturing’ to describe TPS when they printed the results of a five-year study into the automotive industry in the book ‘The Machine That Changed The World’. This gives a pretty good insight into The History Of Lean Manufacturing

Even with the massive amount of research that has taken place into the Toyota Production System, fifty one years after it was born, Slack et al (2001, p481) still refer to Lean Manufacturing as a ‘radical departure from traditional operations practice’.

Ohno (1998) describes the most important objective of the TPS as increasing production efficiency through consistently and thoroughly eliminating waste.

Figure 1. indicates how TPS differs from traditional approaches to improve productivity through adding resources and illustrates the impact of waste elimination on production lead-time.

history of lean manufacturing

So what is waste?

Womack et al (2003) define waste as any activity that consumes resource but adds no value as specified by the customer.

In order for us to understand the waste within manufacturing activities Ohno (1988) broke waste up into 7 elements.

These elements are: Overproduction, Over-processing, Waiting, Transport, Inventory, Motion, and Defects and they are defined from the history of lean manufacturing below:

Overproduction -

Producing things ahead of demand

Waiting -

Inability to move to the next processing step

Transport -

Unnecessary movement of materials between processes

Over processing -

Inappropriate processing of parts, due to poor tool and or product design.

Inventory -

Storing more parts than the absolute minimum.

Movement -

Unnecessary movement of people during the course of their work.

Defects -

Production of defective parts

history of lean manufacturing pic

The Seven Wastes Commonly found in physical production (Womack and Jones 2003, pp 351 – 352)

Ohno (1988) describes the four key elements of a TPS as: Just-In-Time (JIT), Jidoka, Standardised Work and Kaizen.

The make up of each of these elements is covered below

In general terms the key elements of Lean Manufacturing work together to continually improve production processes. Put simply, waste elimination is accomplished through Just In Time and Jidoka, maintained through Standardised work, and improved through Kaizen.

Just In Time (JIT) -

Producing what is needed, when it is needed, in exactly the amount needed. (Using pull systems (Kanban), continuous flow processing, and synchronising the production speed)

Jidoka -

The ability of production to be stopped in the eventuality of a problem, either by the machines themselves or people. (Using ‘stop systems’, and error proofing).

Standardised work -

Standardised procedures concentrating on the most efficient human movements and work sequence for each process.

(Using synchronous production speeds, working sequence and standard in process stock) Kaizen - Never ending job design through continuous improvement (Using a basis of standardised work).

In summary the principles of lean Manufacturing are to reduce waste through the application of a number of process improvement tools.

Understanding the Application of Flow processing techniques

Flow production is based on the Just In Time methodologies that fall within a ‘Lean Manufacturing’ production system. Womack et al (2003) contend that the concept of making products flow is almost counterintuitive and difficult for many people to conceptualise let alone implement.

Flow means producing without (or with minimal) batches, waiting, or wasted motion, in other words flow means that each individual product keeps moving either in the literal sense or in the sense of being continuously worked on.

The concept of flow has origins that predate TPS.

Henry Ford utilised scientific management theory to implement production lines and one-piece production in 1910.

Ford identified that there were two basic ways to build an automobile: one was to keep the automobiles stationary whilst moving the assembly workers around; the other was to keep the assembly workers stationary whilst the automobiles where moved around.

Keniche Sekine (1990, pp3-4) former head of the TPS consulting group describes the situation when Ford discovered the benefit of moving the automobiles around:

Recognizing how bulky and heavy automobiles were, Ford initially thought it better to follow the first concept (keeping cars stationary).

However, one day while looking for ways to eliminate waste from assembly processes, Ford noticed the following:

 Waste in the scattered movement of workers

 Waste in searching for, comparing and finding objects

 Waste in conveying objects

After noticing these types of waste, Ford though long and hard about how he could eliminate them.

Finally, he hit upon the idea of mounting cars on a row of cars that could be pulled along by a rope and winch.

Right away he issued the following instruction to his employees:

1. Set up a large winch and a large thick rope to pull the automobiles along during assembly.

2. Since the factory was about 80m long, divide the assembly line into 15 one hour processes. This would allow the rope to pull all of the automobiles to the next process once per hour.

3. Distribute the assembly parts to their corresponding processes before they are needed.

4. Assign three or four workers to each process and work out the balance of labour by observing the assembly line.”

The experiment proved a big success. Sekine (1990) reports that assembly time per vehicle was reduced from 13 hours to just 5 hours from following the preceding 4 steps.

Ford had established a simple methodology for creating production flow, and almost 100 years later these for steps are evident in conventional techniques used to create production flow in Lean Manufacturing.

These techniques are detailed below

Production flow is a worthy prize for any manufacturer and to achieve it a number of things need to be in place.

Broadly speaking Womack et.al (2003) identifies the pre- requisites to achieve flow as:-

• A clear understanding of your customer requirement so that the production process can be organised to specifically achieve them.

• Production team with responsibility for adding value to the same product should be co-located, and move away from traditional production silos.

• Production equipment should be fit for purpose and well maintained to allow operation with minimal waste.

• Production processes should be standardised to ensure even, consistent paced work without production operators becoming overburdened, or operating in conditions of waste.

• Production employees should attempt to identify and eliminate all waste in production.

• Pull systems should be introduced to ensure that process only produces a good that the subsequent process needs.

• Visual management systems should be implemented so that production process abnormalities and the consequent countermeasure can be easily identified.

Additionally Muhlemann, Oakland & Lockyer (1992) identify the further requirements of:

 Constant demand is required as flow systems are designed to achieve a specified output, if the output changes the lay out of the system will need to be changed in order to avoid the cost of inventory, or failure to meet customer requirements.

 Standardised tasks need to be present to ensure that process variability is minimised and the production line can meet customer demand with minimum levels of waste.

 Material inputs to the system must be on time and to the required quality, as disruption will cause the system to fail.

Flow allows the entire production process to be regulated by the natural laws of supply and demand in a Lean Manufacturing environment.

It works by customer demand stimulating the production of a stock-keeping unit.

In turn the production of a stock-keeping unit stimulates the production and delivery of all the required components…and so on.

The result is that the right parts and materials are produced at the right time and delivered exactly when they are required; in the exact amounts they are needed. Production is ‘pulled’ by the customer rather than being ‘pushed’ by the capabilities (or limitations) of the production system itself, as detailed in this History of Lean article.

Traditionally the physical manifestation of flow production process is the moving production line.

However using a technique called ‘line balancing’ we can get the benefits of a flow line in a fixed assembly position. Sekine (1992) terms fixed assembly manufacture ‘gypsy production’ as the product remains in one place whilst workers move around it.

Line balancing means adjusting the spread of work evenly between people to the rate of customer demand.

In summary, flow production methodologies are not new, but do require a number of things to be in place before they can be implemented within a Lean Manufacturing environment.

Reprinted with the kind permission of Barry Williams (MBA)

Transform YOUR Business through Lean Manufacturing

Lean Six Sigma Black Belt Training

Lean Six Sigma Training & Certification is fast becoming less of a luxury and more of a necessity. Whether you are looking for that next step up the ladder, or need the skills to turn your business around - The Return on Investment from getting Certified will be phenomenal !

Traditional methods of engaging in Lean Sigma Black Belt Certification are very time consuming and costly, especially when many improvement professionals already know the theory and have completed more than enough projects to qualify them for the title of 'Black Belt'.

Our Certification course caters for all levels of experience, with no time restrictions for submission of exam and project documentation.

Get paid what you deserve, get the results you KNOW are possible - Get Certified !

Black Belts standardly earn up to 30% more than their non certified counterparts.

We offer 3 options tailored to your needs, from Yellow Belt training and Certification, up to full Black Belt Certification

Consider it an investment in yourself, You really can't afford not to make a small investment to potentially skyrocket your income.

Get more details for the course below

Lean Six Sigma Training and Certification - More Details Here is what one of our recent students said about our course material, immediately after gaining access to it - "Thank you Mr. Swift. I have looked over the materials and I must say that I am very impressed. Not only is this a course in Lean Six Sigma Principles, it is also an implementation package for my company's manufacturing processes. I am quite frankly blown away by the detail of the material presented."

CD - MBA V.P. of Operations Westfield IN U.S.A